. published our client Chelsea Mitchell’s opinion about the unfairness she experienced being forced to compete against male athletes. But after backlash from the woke mob, editors unilaterally changed Chelsea’s words & called them “hurtful language.” 1/3
Conversation
Replying to
What was the "hurtful language" that editors deleted from Chelsea's opinion piece three days after publication? The word "male." 2/3
43
602
2,963
USA Today violated its principles to appease the mob. This blatant censorship violates the trust we place in media to be honest brokers of public debate.
Chelsea’s experience & viewpoint matters. That’s why we’re posting her original piece here adflegal.org/blog/i-was-fas. 3/3
107
1,454
4,860
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies
:
Wanting to #SaveWomensSports is only hurtful to mediocre men who seek to erase female sporting accomplishments and the concept of fair play in general.
11
82
911
It’s also considered bigoted and hurtful to magical thinkers to point out reality. If you are male born, you cannot transform into a biological female.
10
44
669
Show replies
exactly why I blocked USA Today many moons ago, they've sold their souls to the devil .
1
74
do you have any idea how hurtful it is to deprive women & girls of our ability to acknowledge reality & make simple fact statements to advocate for ourselves? Many are afraid to speak out on these issues, but we all see you and will remember your great cowardice. 👀
2
7
88
Anyone who challenges any aspect of trans ideology has to be gagged and disparaged. I so admire this young woman's courage for speaking the truth. But apparently she doesn't matter, nor do any of us who similarly object. It is utterly sickening.
1
9
Show replies