Reminder that the @ACLU is defending Milo Yiannopoulos in court, despite how his idea of “free speech” outright involves doxxing of private citizens and inciting crimes toward those citizens he’s doxxed.
-
-
Yeah, that's kind of their thing.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Yes, against government intervention in protected speech activities. That's their mission: the Bill of Rights.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @enterthenoid
Nazi speech is inherently violent speech and is not protected
2 réponses 1 Retweet 12 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @enterthenoid
the ACLU *chooses* to regard it as speech worth protecting, and that's why we're in the mess we're in
1 réponse 0 Retweet 10 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Right, the same way they regard speech that you agree with as speech worth protecting.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @enterthenoid
No. speech I agree with doesn't start from the fundamental premise that "genocide is good."
2 réponses 0 Retweet 14 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Okay, and good for you. But the test for what is protected by the First Amendment and what is not allows for noxious speech in certain areas/media/venues without government intervention. This is a legal question, and it has been resoundingly (if messily) answered.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Also, if you feel Nazis are worth defending, you should unfollow now and save yourself a block.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.