Seriously? Wanting to prevent nuclear Armageddon is "crying about things"? Damn. I just lost a lot of respect.
-
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @Doc_Mackey
And let's be very clear, I understand that sometimes we have to do shit things to keep America safe. This, however, ain't it.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
We have to stand for something and preventing a mad man from having nuclear weapons sounds like a pretty good thing to stand for to me
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Doc_Mackey
Well, here's the problem. We agreed on a no nuclear weapon deal, back in 1990ish, but then the GOP killed it.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @Doc_Mackey
So if we're looking at root causes, it's not the Left leading the way here.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @Doc_Mackey
In addition, there are some very complex geopolitical realities going on there that means if we go in guns blazing,
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @Doc_Mackey
both China AND Russia are unlikely to take it well. At all. And that's a serious problem.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Now the China and Russia thing I agree on but it's something we'll have to navigate around. I personally believe we can't stand by and watch
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Doc_Mackey
Making unilateral declarations with no input from those two is kind of the opposite of navigating the waters.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Good thing you or I aren't in the know about it we have spoken with them about this or not eh?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
When the White House is saying "ignore the President," I feel fairly confident that we are not, in fact, conversing with them.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.