You aren't defending "free speech." You are defending "I'd like people to be dead because of skin color/ethnicity/etc." as a valid point.
-
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
As a Jewish guy: draw the line for me in wiggle-room-free legalese. Something that would hold up in court.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Dave_Cochran
"If you advocate for genocide, you lose your right to talk."
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
How is that not covered already by hate speech laws? (genuinely want to agree with you, but MAN is that slope slippery)
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @Dave_Cochran
If it was covered by hate laws, why isn't Richard Spencer in jail?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Because he's a troll who knows how to skirt the line. A sufficiently motivated prosecutor with a sufficiently informed judge>
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Dave_Cochran @ChrisWarcraft
>could PROBABLY get a conviction, but there's not *enough* sufficently informe, apolitical judges to get it to stick.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @Dave_Cochran
Then I posit our current laws are not working as intended, thus proving my point.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Give me a few hours to go home & eat & exercise & re-read the whole thread and I'll respond to that :)
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.