if you give govt authority to censor content based speech because it's wrong, you extend the ability to all viewpoints.
-
-
-
While that is a valid point: If the content of your speech leads to a crime, you are complicit in that crime.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
it's not about defending a nazi, it's about giving the govt authority to control speech
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I feel like Milo being on Fox has more outreach. Maher is/interviews many Islamophobes, which is almost an intro to Breitbart
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
I feel like peak MILO has already passed, tho...
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
the correct term for these people is "collaborators"
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
I agree with most of what you say, but not this. I defend people's right to make invalid points, free from government control
-
Nobody mentioned the government. He's talking about the moral imperative of media platforms.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I agree Mahar shouldn't give him a platform, but that's not the same as defending his right to speak w/o gov interference.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.