2/2 My point is stand up to them, debate them, ridicule them constantly. But don't deny right to speak. It martyrs/empowers.
-
-
En réponse à @AlanNeff
This isn't a theoretical argument. The same thing is happening now that happened back then, almost step for step.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @AlanNeff
And I think "if you advocate genocide you lose your right to speak" is a very bright line that's obvious when crossed.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
We'll have to agree to disagree. Advocating genocide - odious, repellent, you choose adjective - is not committing genocide.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @AlanNeff
Why give them the ability to accumulate that power?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Chris, this is really tough for me. I hate advocating free speech for Nazis. But I don't want my speech limited.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. Please, don't say that. I'm opposed to limitations on speech. That's all.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @AlanNeff
If you protect Nazi's right to speak, they will gain power, they will use power, and people die. We are watching it in real time.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
I'm really sorry we disagree. I understand what you're saying. i know my position has risks in it. But so does yours.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Oh sure, there's always the risk someone tries to take it too far. That's why "advocating for genocide equals loss of speech" is
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.