I know you're not being snarky. But see Niemoller: when you take away one group ('s rights), you open the door.
-
-
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
2/2 My point is stand up to them, debate them, ridicule them constantly. But don't deny right to speak. It martyrs/empowers.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @AlanNeff
This isn't a theoretical argument. The same thing is happening now that happened back then, almost step for step.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @AlanNeff
And I think "if you advocate genocide you lose your right to speak" is a very bright line that's obvious when crossed.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
We'll have to agree to disagree. Advocating genocide - odious, repellent, you choose adjective - is not committing genocide.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Sure, they advocate it because they want genocide to happen. But, to gain followers, they WANT to be censored/underdogs.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @AlanNeff
Because then they can take that next little step. And then the next little step. And then, well, we know where it ends.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Right. Oppose, resist, organize, volunteer, donate. Do all of the above. That's what I do.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Now just add "And don't let Nazis spread their ideology because it leads to Nazis in power" and we're golden.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.