I know you're not being snarky. But see Niemoller: when you take away one group ('s rights), you open the door.
-
-
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
2/2 My point is stand up to them, debate them, ridicule them constantly. But don't deny right to speak. It martyrs/empowers.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @AlanNeff
This isn't a theoretical argument. The same thing is happening now that happened back then, almost step for step.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @AlanNeff
And I think "if you advocate genocide you lose your right to speak" is a very bright line that's obvious when crossed.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
We'll have to agree to disagree. Advocating genocide - odious, repellent, you choose adjective - is not committing genocide.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @AlanNeff
Why give them the ability to accumulate that power?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Chris, this is really tough for me. I hate advocating free speech for Nazis. But I don't want my speech limited.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. Please, don't say that. I'm opposed to limitations on speech. That's all.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
If you protect Nazi's right to speak, they will gain power, they will use power, and people die. We are watching it in real time.
-
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
I'm really sorry we disagree. I understand what you're saying. i know my position has risks in it. But so does yours.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @AlanNeff
Oh sure, there's always the risk someone tries to take it too far. That's why "advocating for genocide equals loss of speech" is
0 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.