You can call yourself whatever you want, but if you consistently only take positions that defend Nazis, you're actually a Nazi sympathizer.
-
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Except for defending the right of free speech for Nazis, because the 1st Amendment separates us from dictatorships.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @AlanNeff
You are under no obligation to defend the speech of those whose stated goal is to take your speech away.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
Have to disagree here. Got into law because I admired ACLU defending right of repellent Nazis to march in Skokie in 60s.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @AlanNeff
And where has that led us? Not being snarky, empirically speaking, what has defending Nazis gotten us?
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
I know you're not being snarky. But see Niemoller: when you take away one group ('s rights), you open the door.
4 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
2/2 My point is stand up to them, debate them, ridicule them constantly. But don't deny right to speak. It martyrs/empowers.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Counterpoint - allowing Nazis the right to speak allows them to assemble/grow. We know their goal. They tell us their goal.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.