Armed citizenry has very little chance of overthrowing the US government in modern day. Once an Abrams rolls in tunes change.
-
-
-
I totally agree, and have used that argument myself. That being said, can we convince enough of the military?
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Ukraine threw their Manafort-aided, Putin-installed president out through non-violent protest. Up to 750 died though
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
I don't think the right co-opted it. I think the left has created a stance where it would feel hypocritical to *initiate* it
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
It is sadly ironic that the left has railed against guns for so long only to now potentially need them.
-
It is also ironic that the right has clung to guns for so long in case of a tyrannical leader only to accept one w/ open arms
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
My issue is more: What are the mechanics? Is it all about getting the armed forces to turn?
-
it has to be. The citizenry can do some, but not much against tanks and drones
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I'm not afraid of the government. I'm afraid of right-wing militias and people who want to be Trump's Sturmabteilung.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
this is the main problem with the idea. 75% (or more) of guns are in the hands of ppl who are thrilled about a fascist regime
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.