We don't make seat belts mandatory because it stops us from crashing our cars. We do it because it mitigates the harm that can occur.
-
-
-
En réponse à @Defund_Vert
yes, because spending hundreds of millions of dollars more a year on easily preventable medical bills is SUPER smart
1 réponse 1 Retweet 6 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
I don't need the state to tell me how to keep myself safe. If I don't want wear a seatbelt, that's me making my own decision.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Defund_Vert
yes, and it's a decision that costs everyone else money if you get injured more severely than you would otherwise
1 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
If the goal of the government is now to keep everyone safe from themselves, shall we outlaw cigarettes/alcohol/pot/fast cars?
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Defund_Vert
I'm not saying outlaw guns, and if you use that disingenuous line of reasoning again I will block you. We're talking regulation
4 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
how much is too much? There may be costs borne by the state but those need to be weighed against what it costs the individual
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Defund_Vert
And that's exactly what the NRA is preventing by framing every attempt at regulation as "THEY'RE OUTLAWING GUNS"
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
But then, I guess the question, I would pose would what gun restrictions would you suggest? Handguns only?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
all guns to require DNA safety interlocks, a max ammo capacity of 4 rounds, and no speed reloads
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.