We don't make seat belts mandatory because it stops us from crashing our cars. We do it because it mitigates the harm that can occur.
-
-
It's lazy to block someone in the middle of a civil debate, but I digress. I'm not suggesting you are saying we should outlaw
-
no, that's exactly what you said, and it's intellectually lazy. I don't mind arguing, but I will not waste my time.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
guns. I'm saying that we can't take concepts such as "we have to keep everyone safe" to the extreme. At some point, personal
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
liberties need to be considered. I'm fine with restrictions on things like AK-47s, but as the seatbelt is a good example,
-
Also don't like seatbelt analogy. Only irresponsible ppl not wearing seatbelts die, but when irresponsible ppl
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
how much is too much? There may be costs borne by the state but those need to be weighed against what it costs the individual
-
And that's exactly what the NRA is preventing by framing every attempt at regulation as "THEY'RE OUTLAWING GUNS"
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.