@M_Woulf Except, you know, for that little thing called facts. Feel free to read the 76 page court document. I did. It appears Clay didn't.
-
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
@ChrisWarcraft@M_Woulf why do you keep referring to those as facts, they are plaintiffs arguments. Not a judgment. know the difference.1 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @dotclynch
@dotclynch Oh? So sworn testimony under oath that could then be introduced at trial isn't facts anymore? Huh. Learn something new every day.9 réponses 0 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
@ChrisWarcraft In your lawsuits against the NFL certainly you have had you seen sworn testimony against your that you would contend is false1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
En réponse à @dotclynch
@dotclynch Never made it to sworn testimony. Vikings did their independent investigation and then settled.
18:49 - 17 févr. 2016
0 réponse
0 Retweet
1 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.