Chuck Johnson responds to Gawker's anti-SLAPP. It's 111 pages long. Part 1: https://popehat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Chuck-Johnson_v_Gawker_have-you-ever-seen-a-trainwreck-on-paper-part-1.pdf …; 2: https://popehat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Chuck-Johnson_v_Gawker_have-you-ever-seen-a-trainwreck-on-paper-part-2.pdf …
-
-
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh Dp you think Chuck realizes that if his defense actually holds up, literally everyone he's insulted on Twitter can sue him?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
@ChrisWarcraft how so? (there are a lot of, um, "defenses" here.)1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh In the first ten or so pages when he says "People saying mean things about me online prevents me from doing my job"1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
@ChrisWarcraft lol. I don't think it would remotely be a defense, but I don't even know what that argument is trying to establish.3 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@adamsteinbaugh journalism properly because people won't talk to him(?) and thus it's grounds for defamation. Which, if applied in the
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.