Yes!! Near elections aside, this stuff should be on the record because the more basis for a common narrative there is, the better. Even if R senators try to backtrack, they still have to explain themselves. Sources of evidence, please!
-
-
-
For once, could Democrat politicians use what they do well- have/ rely on expertise, look for verifiable evidence, do the actual work- to make life difficult for the people on whom soft skills have no effect.l?
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Right. I dont think one senator or one voter would be swayed either way with on record witness testimony. It would however give the QOP shyster lawyers an opportunity to make a further mockery of this trial than they have. If it were a jury trial would agree 100%.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
mixed feelings. people I want to hear from and to be held accountable will not agree to testify. subpoenas will take forever. I don't know if we'd ever get what I (and u?) want here. they are going on record with their acquittal. outcome clear. best we can get? idk
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Chris, the time for putting people on record is over. The people on the record don't care, the media does not care. Everyone else already knows what they need to know. Dragging this on for a year when you can't enforce any of it is pointless.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.