I am arguing the null hypothesis, that we should not make the ridiculously specific claims about things you don't understand and cannot understand
What part of “and I will gladly be proven wrong” are you not getting from this conversation? Science is making the best decisions with the information we have at the time, and then being willing to change our minds once new evidence presents itself.
-
-
If anything, you’re the one weirdly wedded to the idea of space whales, and like, I get it, the world sucks, space whales would rule, but there is absolutely nothing to suggest that’s a viable hypothesis at this time.
-
You brought up space whales.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
"God exists, prove me wrong" "There's no way of proving that claim, it's reliant on assertions that can't be proven true or false" "Ah, so you can't prove me wrong, therefore I am right" oh for sure man
-
You’re the one arguing for the existence of God (FTL aliens) in this particular instance, so I’m not sure that’s exactly the argument you want to be making
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.