This is from WHO, but anybody care to qualify this with more information? We've long held that it's 2% mortality, but 3.4% would be a more significant jump. (I assume that jump is concentrated more in older or compromised populations.)https://twitter.com/WHO/status/1234872254883909642 …
-
-
whoa weird
-
All so true. It's probably more widespread here than previously thought & impossible to really quantify a mortality rate, without knowing the actual infection rate. As noted, funny how shutting down the global-health-security unit of the NSC & cutting CDC funding didn't work out.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.