You aren’t that thin-skinned, everyone who’s followed you before knows this, so the whole tactical pearl-clutching act is overdone.
-
-
En réponse à @TheMittani
Maybe you should start thinking about all the people who aren’t as thick skinned as me and what kind of campaign weakness that might be? Because all this type of online shit does is hurts Bernie’s chances to win, and if that’s your goal, well, this is remarkably shortsighted.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @TheMittani
I mean, approach it from an EVE standpoint. Multiple people have told you there’s a potential fracture point in your alliance. Do you just ignore them and keep on with business as usual? Or do you address the weakness?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft
It’s a good question, and according to some of the campaign pros in my timeline from my recent howling at the moon phase (which was like, last week lawl), none of this shit makes an impact on voter behavior at all. Twitter brainworms are irrelevant, in theory. I’m not certain...
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheMittani @ChrisWarcraft
What I do think is that, based on what we’ve learned from Manufacturing Consent, flak operations may not impact voter behavior, but they might impact influencer behavior; if you know that talking shit about St. Bernard will flood your mentions with
you’re less likely...1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheMittani @ChrisWarcraft
And in this case, when you see a big influencer making a whole sturm und drang about being on the receiving end of a flak barrage, that’s a signal to triple the amount of outgoing flak on target to deter by proxy other hostile outlets/influencers etc. It also seems to be useful -
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheMittani @ChrisWarcraft
to boost a message from the twitter hellworld into the mainstream; pundits and the thin-skinned howling about
stuff report in outrage about how they took incoming on twitter, and all older voters on the TV hear is ‘Pete is a rat, people say!’ They don’t care about shitposts.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheMittani @ChrisWarcraft
That said, I’ve only recently turned my brain to examining real world political messaging and tactics, but if you take a dash of Manufacturing Consent and combine it with some Saul Alinsky, there’s value in online flak campaigns and apparently zero risk of harming votes.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheMittani @ChrisWarcraft
Anyway I’ve always respected the work you did politically so there’s a bunch of brain vomit on my current working theory of the purpose of online flak, and I’d prefer to see you not making yourself a target for barrage after barrage - even if that has utility as a hypo. deterrent
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheMittani
Oh I don’t mind being the target if it takes some ire away from others and gets people thinking about the problem. I just don’t want people thinking there isn’t a problem, because if Bernie’s the candidate, I want him to have the best chance of succeeding as possible.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
And I think about 70% of the current activity is bot-driven, but the Bernie-Bro meme didn’t spring out of thin air from nowhere. The harm the bots do can really be lessened by making it obvious that number’s closer to 90-95%, but that requires some people to change.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.