Anyways, while the quote may be “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity,” I propose that malice and stupidity are intersectional.
-
-
En réponse à @ChrisWarcraft @JamesFrye
I take and agree with what I think is your point, but using the language of intersectionality in this context is questionable
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
As I understand it, intersectionality as a social critique is about the way systems of oppression reinforce themselves when they overlap an individual's identity
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @WattleOfBits @JamesFrye
I understand it differently, in that intersectionality is recognizing where your desires as an <insert oppressed class> overlap with another <different oppressed class>’s desires, and how you should be working together to dismantle the system that keeps you both down.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
And in that case, the corollary is that oppression can also be intersectional, in that while two groups may not desire the same end goal, they’re still capable of working together to achieve secondary goals along the way.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.