Except we're not talking about operational matters, we're talking about the broader strategic decisions that Mattis implemented as a *civilian*.
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
En réponse à @ingloriousBOH
Respectfully, that's bullshit. SecDef has always been an executive role to provide civilian oversight, and prior direct military knowledge, while helpful, is by no means a requirement.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
En réponse à @ingloriousBOH
So we agree that someone who hasn't directly served can still be knowledgable about the geopolitical landscape then.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
En réponse à @ingloriousBOH
And what purpose does the pragmatic realities of national security have to do with sending troops to the border or saying that LBGTQ individuals and women are a negative to the armed services? (I won't get into Yemen because I feel we'll substantially disagree on Saudi Arabia)
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
Then we're actually in agreement there
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.