If we apply the standards used in “quantum theory” to the issue of phlogiston, then “can you prove it” is followed not with “no” but with “Its impossible to detect phlogiston because it’s made of pippistron, which disappears when you look at it” and science goes “sounds legit!”
-
-
Now I'll grant you that certain models very much are a "let's throw stuff at the chalkboard and maybe some of it sticks," but there are very concrete models of what we currently know within the quantum realm that don't invalidate some of the stranger aspects.
-
And I think to dismiss the entirety of quantum mechanics simply because parts are not traditionally provable via empirical testing is an incredibly egotistical view that assumes if we can't sense something, then it can't exist.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I mean, i understand that, but it’s virtually impossible to find ANY hard raw scientific data in the field or quantum mechanics. It’s all this:pic.twitter.com/sGvCkwn8xG
-
Quantum entaglement exists, and has been empirically demonstrated. Quantum dots, the article I linked, form the backbone of multiple current scientific experiments and some television displays. There are currently multiple computers utilizing qbits.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.