maybe. but again, i'm not saying they were good. i'm saying that the thing he did with voting to keep ACA was good. and this shouldn't be a problematic statement.
-
-
this is basically taking the position that we shouldn't ever negotiate or attempt to find consensus with those we disagree with (because it makes us "complicit in evil"). this is where resistance ends and radicalism begins.
-
No, I'm saying that when someone has a sustained pattern of behavior, that they consistently engage in, then that's who they are. If they want to try to change? Good, I'm all for it, but a single act is not change. Change is a constant, ongoing commitment to be *better.*
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
"this person did one thing i agree with" is not tolerating evil.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.