2200-2150 BC, 1800-1700 BC, and 1100-1000 BC would be the main ones (also fitting my personal observation that most empires last around 300ish years or so, so we're in for a treat).
I mean, sure, we can get into the whole discussion of "what is truth," but I'm comfortable in what I've studied compared to what has been unearthed compared to what other accounts of the time said, and none of it is dependent on a single account.
-
-
The overarching theme historically, both by those for empire and hostile to empire, is human beings in large groupings tend to act in certain ways (local tribe first; semi-local next; fuck you I got mine). I haven't seen anything in modern accounts to make me think otherwise.
-
is that because it's immutable truth, because of a failing of modern accounts, or a failing of yourself? how would you know?
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
yes. asserting an immutable human nature that is available to be observed by any non-dumb person is gonna run hard into "what is truth", lol
-
"Truth" is that atoms will spin, matter will decay, and entropy will eventually win. Anything else is what we bring to the table. That being said, what we bring to the table has turned out to be pretty predictable (again, with exceptions).
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.