Again, age is not a defense. Stop suggesting it.
I did, based on the historical record. I can link you the wikipedia timeline of major events if you want sources. (I also remember studying that time period in college, but say what you will about wikipedia, it's generally sourced well on widely known subjects)
-
-
like, okay, but observing that historians divided history into chunks of X years for their convenience does not result in the idea that human history is inherently cyclical
-
It's not a matter of dividing history into chunks, it's a matter of observing repeatable events. "X1 slew Y1 in order to gain Z1. Three hundred years later, X2 slew Y2 in order to gain Z2." The threads aren't the same, but the weave is very familiar.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.