body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2022 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Chris Loesch 

Apparently wishing the murder of a conservative woman’s children doesn’t violate

@TwitterSupport

terms of service. DISGUSTING! twitter.com/milanlegius/st

This Tweet is unavailable.

2:01 AM · Aug 27, 2018

Replying to

Apparently

was overruled. Post is now blocked.

3

4

16

Replying to

Heaven itself testifies against this malfeasance if you never do. #UnequalWeightsAndMeasures

5

7

@claramanoucheka

Replying to

What are going to do about it

??

2

11

20

Replying to

Interesting 'algorithm'. How does that work? Are some people tagged 'evil conservative'...so any vicious words said at them are flagged ok? Others tagged 'righteous lib' and the tiniest slight against them results in Twitter jail? Insecure children running the show.

2

9

35

Betsy Brantner Smith

Replying to

Really

? Threatening to murder children doesn't violate your "standards?"

5

18

48

Replying to

Oh my God,

...seriously?

1

4

7

Replying to

This is horrible

2

9