Successful, but insufficient. As we learned from Challengers O-rings: a margin of safety is something that doesn't get touched.
-
-
-
You can't say: Oh, we only burned through one third of the o-ring. So we a have two thirds left. No. The o-rings are not supposed to burn through. And the parachutes are not supposed to fail either.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Oh, I totally agree. But if it was
@SpaceX you know this would be "BREAKING NEWS" of a failure of the parachute system that is MEANT to carry astronauts to the ISS! Maybe@BoeingSpace should get a taste of that medicine??? -
Spaceflight by spite. Interesting idea.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
A very twisted explanation...
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
During the Apollo abort test, the Little Joe II booster the capsule was sitting on went out of control and disintegrated. The launch escape system performed well and the capsule was recovered safely. Unanticipated events can make for great test data!https://youtu.be/AqeJzItldSQ?t=102 …
-
man i wanted to post this ^^. but yes that was a "good" test i proofed that the system works,, literaly ^^.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I was concerned about the orange cloud of N2O4 from the crashed SM drifting closectovthe crew capsule.
-
That was expected. A real life pad abort would dump the service module in the water. No BFRC. Maybe a LFRC. And a lot of fish poisoned by the sudden introduction of nitric acid.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The real question now is whether Boeing will be held to the same standard as the (much cheaper) Spacex?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.