Christopher C. CuomoVerified account

@ChrisCuomo - You're incorrect on both assertions. Please provide specific references that lead you to these conclusions.

@MJ_Collinz Jennifer Wright Knust http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/09/my-take-the-bible%E2%80%99s-surprisingly-mixed-messages-on-sexuality/?sr=sharebar_twitter …

@ChrisCuomo - She doesn't even cite specific passages to Paul to support her interpretation.

@MJ_Collinz so, you dismiss the idea that they exist? What do you make of her rationales overall? Again, thanks, mike.

@ChrisCuomo Leviticus 20:13 could not be more clear. There is no hierarchy of sin here, and homosexuals are not greater sinners than others

@MJ_Collinz thanks, mike - and to all of you for the ideas and only a smattering of intolerance of the question (not bad for twitter :)

.@ChrisCuomo that 2000 yr old book is internally contradictory & was cobbled together by male hierarchy for specific purposes.

@Kirstycat1209 I am operating on a premise that is out there regarding #DuckDynasty beliefs and asking about other ideas by same writer

.@ChrisCuomo agree, times change-St. Paul spoke to a different audience. Using 2000 yr old book to justify views agst gays is not acceptable

@Kirstycat1209 i take your point, but for those who regard it differently, i want their take on the consistency of thought

@ChrisCuomo Slippery slope thinking there. Man's definition of good/evil may change, but not God's. No morality without a moral law.

@chrisagrissom but wouldn't we then have to have similar feelings about slavery? And thanks for answering my question. #NewDay convo

@ChrisCuomo God never condoned the type of slavery we had in America. Exodus 21:16. Most were indentured servants. No social security then.

@chrisagrissom you mean social insurance :) Thanks for the perspective. Merry Christmas

@ChrisCuomo No concept of homosexuality as an "orientation" at time of Paul. And Paul said, "No longer slave or free in Christ..."