I am searching for evidence based on unassailable immunological principle that indiscriminately immunizing the infected is a danger.
This is NOT the same as the “vaccines cause autism” hogwash.
Immunology is a science - & U are stuck in Ur stale OLD narrative.
@US_FDA aware.
-
-
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
Again, your searching for evidence involves using deaths the same way antivaxxers do. Please explain HOW what you are doing with anecdotes of death after
#COVIDVaccine is ANY different from what antivaxxers do with anecdotes of death and adverse events after ANY vaccination.1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Grow up! Brain on! You undermine a serious and clear safety concern. U R a danger to public health because U undermine an avoidable safety concern. U shld be on the side of safely. It’s shameful. Truly. Brain on!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @gorskon and
Antivaccine activists think their concerns about autism and SIDS are serious. They look up stories online and decide they show that.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @noorchashm and
They also come up with sciencey sounding theories. Actual scientists follow data, rather than look for anecdotes and try to shoehorn them into an idea. You have an hypothesis. It’s fair to try and convince scientists/FDA. Not to dig anecdotes and declare they’re proof.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
FDA danger signals the way they are doing it, starts with anecdotes. I know this well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @gorskon and
I will look at any evidence you have that FDA signals start with random people on the internet looking for media anecdotes and claiming they’re signals.
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
-
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @noorchashm @gorskon and
From the story: note that they don’t think the vaccine had an effect. You are taking this tragedy and using it to support your theory with no evidence. Just like antivaccine activists who point to anecdotes.pic.twitter.com/zKTXtKhfso
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
Brett Chrest Retweeted Brett Chrest
He must have muted me because I posted the exact same article alreadyhttps://twitter.com/Chrest_brett/status/1360033753599475712 …
Brett Chrest added,
-
-
Replying to @Chrest_brett @doritmi and
He doesn’t seem very keen on listening to anyone who does not yet have a terminal degree
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @shmoopythescie1 @doritmi and
Brett Chrest Retweeted Brett Chrest
Similar thing happened to Edward when he gave input, so I decided to point out this quote:https://twitter.com/Chrest_brett/status/1358964951596097540 …
Brett Chrest added,
Brett Chrest @Chrest_brett"Scientists, when they are practising science, only speak with any authority when they are reflecting best evidence. If they instead advocate a position unsupported by the evidence, their qualifications are utterly irrelevant" https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/embr.201948706 … https://twitter.com/ENirenberg/status/1358940313272938499 …0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.