.@TomTugendhat and @juliapamilih wrote in @timesredbox on how the UK's net zero push will create new vulnerabilities on China for rare earths unless we take steps now to build resilience.https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/depending-on-china-for-rare-earth-metals-leaves-britain-vulnerable-03t2k6vxk …
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
That's because China controls up to 90% of processing and refining of rare earths, and has a near-monopoly on the production of rare earth magnets.pic.twitter.com/FdIvvemR5L
Näytä tämä ketju -
Beijing is unlikely to deliberately cut off supply. But this has created a situation of serious strategic dependence - as well as raising ethical questions of opaque supply chains and environmental challenges from high-carbon production.
Näytä tämä ketju -
China's strategy is evolving. In 2020, it became the world’s largest importer of seven types of rare earths. Offshoring low-value mining means that critical minerals will play an increasingly important role in the Belt and Road, complicating attempts to reduce dependence.
Näytä tämä ketju -
The state model is here to stay. Most developed industrial economies are now building regionalised or domestic sovereign supply chains as a matter of national security. The US, Japan and Australia are spending hundreds of millions of dollars on stockpiles, subsidies and support.
Näytä tämä ketju -
In the face of China’s dominance and rising state-backed competition for access to critical minerals, the UK needs a resilience-focused strategy in order to protect its manufacturing base and national security.
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.