Maza has not been hurt by this. He took offense. Keyword being ‘took.’ Offense is not a metric by which we can gauge damage or abuse. And if you look at some of his posts, the main kind of ‘harassment’ he’s received is from people telling him to debate Crowder.
-
-
Replying to @ChickenRocko @gaywonk and
I dunno about you, but literally countless people knowing my dox would be fucking terrifying, especially when they are all fans of a single person who takes virtually every opportunity to personally demean and belittle you with known slurs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
Welp. Crowder didn’t dox him. And he certainly doesn’t take “virtually every opportunity to demean and belittle” Maza. Heck, if you wanna go deeper, he didn’t even use a slur. He said “lispy queer from Vox.” Unless you think being queer is a bad thing, that’s just a fact.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChickenRocko @gaywonk and
Yeah he wasn't directly responsible, but are you really going to give him zero credit for fostering such an environment? Honestly, if you can find a single Crowder video mentioning Maza that doesn't resort to personal demeaning insults, I'll be impressed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
Yes, I’m going to give him zero credit for it. He’s openly denounced targeted harassment and doxxing. Also, can you find me instances of Maza discussing conservatives without resorting to demeaning insults and verbal tripe?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChickenRocko @gaywonk and
Here's another one with zero personal insults. I mean these honestly are not difficult to find.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cijh3bdxwmE …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
Again, calling Fox News stupid and saying they’re ‘bad’ for you. These are just insults, and they’re what he does every time he posts one of these videos, because he can’t help but try to malign his opponents’ viewpoints for his own political agenda. It’s not journalism.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChickenRocko @The_CO_Atheist and
Again: Crowder did not use “toxic” language. Crowder has not targeted Maza for harassment or bullying and has denounced people for doing so. If you want to make “offense” the standard by which we deplatform folks, then 99+% of content creators are also guilty.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChickenRocko @gaywonk and
I played your game when you refused to accommodate my request, and proceeded to shift the goalposts when provided ample evidence of how this is not even a fair comparison. If you don't find Crowder's behavior toxic in any way, then we're done here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
Dude, you’re the only one who’s shifted goalposts. You said he said some “toxic,” it’s not true. You said he tried to harm Maza, it’s not true. You said he’s responsible for creating a culture to dox Maza, it’s not true.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And again, you don’t seem to be getting that Maza’s work is obviously against conservatives, and it could be found to be offensive, just like Crowder’s. Offense is not a standard by which we measure harm, b/c it’s always taken, not always given.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
