Congrats! Q: Judge seemed focused on “due date” using “elections” to make his pt. I did not understand the comparison. As I see it, elections & TIFs differ; unlike elections, with TIFs there is no fixed due date, so EAVs can be gamed, as with LY. Someone please explain?
-
-
-
There was no TIF end date, except as pushed forward by SB, Rahm, Reifman. Then at other end of the spectrum, judge said something like, you’re not arguing for a “moving target,” are you? That didn’t seem quite right to me either...hmm.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.