Chatham HouseVerified account

cc @alimhaider

Wow.

+ Don't knows > rejection in all but one case.

The Don’t Knows are pro’ly mostly people who agree, but are too shy to say.

we need to ask Labour why they won't campaign for more Islamic immigration if its so enriching as they say

I agree. With a question like this the only number that matters is the red “Disagree” @_coltseavers

issues of identity, safety, thinking of your children.....this is a very dangerous path our 'elite' have taken us

Oh and thishttps://twitter.com/asherahresearch/status/828936428797165572 …

is 'Muslim' a racial or religious question? Many 'Muslims' are forced into their inherited religion and cannot leave!

It's not our problem. No Muslims. No Mosques. No Apologies.

Agreed on the no mosques and no apologies bit. But again who are the 'Muslims'? How do u know one?!

Anyone who is willing to identify themselves as a Muslim regardless of their practice, is one.

good measure, yet that's not what the US did with the travel ban of the 7 named countries!

The travel ban's language doesn't specify religion,jus total travel ban on all citizens of these.

However, it exempts religious minorities, again without specifying, which are of course, the

Christians in the concerned countries. Thus, the reason for the court case against it.