I read it. As a criterion for evaluating debate fairly. Let's set the following criteria: 1. facts in chronological order; 2. current situation; 3. changes; 4. responses; 5. outlook.
Experts across Chatham House analyse the key policy issues discussed in the first and only #VPDebate between Vice President Mike Pence and California Senator Kamala Harrishttps://www.chathamhouse.org/2020/10/us-vice-presidential-debate-five-key-takeaways?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=organic-social&utm_campaign=us-election&utm_content=vp-debate …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In addition to the above, almost 8 years in power. ＋Let's say 50 years, plus a review of the promises made by each party. The expert analysis is mostly off the mark.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.