Does the G20 Still Matter? The G20 is far too large, what the world really needs is a more representative G7, writes Chatham House Chair Jim O'Neillhttps://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/does-g20-still-matter …
Show this thread
-
Chatham House Chair Jim O'Neill: 'There are two barriers standing in the G20’s way. First, though it is representative, it is also far too large. What the world really needs is a more representative G7, comprising the US, Japan, the European Union, and the BRIC countries.'
Show this thread
Chatham House Chair Jim O'Neill: 'The G20’s second deficiency is that it (as well as the G7) lacks an objective framework through which to set goals and measure progress toward them. Since the group’s initial success a decade ago, its agenda has been fluid'
-
-
I think the G20 is fine. What’s wrong is saying that some countries are more important than others. There are many countries but only one Earth, shouldn’t they all get a say on its future & not just the richest ones?pic.twitter.com/hlAAg4yYix
-
Some countries are more important than others. It's human lives that are equally important. There are 1.4 billion human lives in China versus 1.3 million in Estonia (and I really like Estonia, don't get me wrong).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.