The difference is Ellsberg's leak helped (in a small but real way) end the Vietnam War _and_ Nixon; Assange's leak helped elect Trump. Procedure isn't everything; the substantive end matters. https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/946184238432505856 …
No they would not have been--efficacy of leaks, however measured, is not what I'm getting at
-
-
difference between "efficacy" and "substantive end"?
-
hrc campaign launched a new morality, where the ethics of any given action are judged solely on whether or not it helped her campaign. imo it was incoherent throughout the election and remains so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.