"IHL alone can only promise soldiers will come closer to conforming to their moral obligations if they follow IHL than if they violate IHL"https://twitter.com/just_security/status/806856395727454210 …
-
-
Replying to @Barrie_Sander
@AdHaque110 Is this position complemented/challenged by e.g.@ChMadar's on limits of legal discourse on#drones? http://www.bookforum.com/inprint/023_04/16816 …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Barrie_Sander
:
@AdHaque110 places IHL in moral universe in tandem w jus ad b but@ChMadar more skeptical morality/law in favor of politics3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
It's not that I'm skeptical of morality, just that I don't see law as a better proxy for core moral…
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar @samuelmoyn and
…issues than political analysis of war, or for that matter strategic analysis which is also…
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ChaseMadar @samuelmoyn and
…morally charged, morally loaded. Strategic discourse is unfairly maligned by liberals as a…
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ChaseMadar @samuelmoyn and
…Realpolitik reptile house. In fact strategic discourse is, in its quiet prudentialist way…
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
…as saturated with moral reasoning as the noisier moralizing of liberals like Ignatiev, Power, Packer
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.