True, but the more power a person/institution has, the more transparency is required and for very practical, consequentialist reasons. https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/786226506989178880 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ChaseMadar @ChMadar
What about random climate scientists? Or Sony employees? Or anyone who emailed the DNC or Podesta?
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @chrislhayes
The more power they have, the less privacy they should have and that should include powerful private corporations like Sony.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar @ChMadar
What about random climate scientists? Or lawyers defending unpopular clients? The same tools can be used against anyone.
6 replies 2 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @chrislhayes
They can be, and they should not be. But those bemoaning DNC's loss of privacy zB ignore the social costs of DNC opacity.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar @ChMadar
and any campaign is going to have private conversations about strategy/messaging, etc..
4 replies 2 retweets 10 likes
I think it's great and useful to learn what HRC is saying behind closed doors to her big donors, who are also big constituents.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.