True, but the more power a person/institution has, the more transparency is required and for very practical, consequentialist reasons. https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/786226506989178880 …
-
-
There are plenty of gray areas, sure, and some things that Wikileaks has done, like release SSNs of GOP donors, are just wrong
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about random climate scientists? Or lawyers defending unpopular clients? The same tools can be used against anyone.
-
They can be, and they should not be. But those bemoaning DNC's loss of privacy zB ignore the social costs of DNC opacity.
-
and any campaign is going to have private conversations about strategy/messaging, etc..
-
I think it's great and useful to learn what HRC is saying behind closed doors to her big donors, who are also big constituents.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
difficult argument. what’s the power threshold for personal privacy?
-
The line-drawing here requires discernment, but that doesn't mean it's not possible or undesirable.
-
drawing lines is always the issue. think it’s central.
-
but the point here is that there's no one drawing the line. We're not having a policy discussion. We've entered a world
-
Let's have that policy discussion! I mean, please, put it on your show!
-
I endorse this proposal.
-
Good guest to talk about private-sector secrecy overkill is
@OrlyLobel.@JesselynRadack for natsec.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.