I mean that’s not at all what I say in the column. You should delete the tweet.
-
-
-
yes it is. to the extent that you criticize the MoU, it's for barring Israel from lobbying Congress for more
-
I have like three paragraphs on how Israel doesn’t need the money. What are you talking about?
-
yet that doesn't stop you from presenting lobbying restriction (+ requirement to buy US arms) as somehow miserly
-
also if you read the link in that graf about spending on US industry, it’s to a column saying Israel should give up aid.
-
You write that the $38bn is "less than it seems"and imply the US should rescind Iran deal and lobbying restrix and the…
-
…phase-out of the offshore procurement carve-out; that given overall MidEast policy, the $38bn in aid is less than lavish.
-
On this point, the piece links to an earlier column arguing for phase out of aid https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-06-22/obama-wants-to-stop-subsidizing-israel-s-defense-industry …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
please read the actual column. "Of course, Israel doesn't even need the money.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.