Trying to achieve a less violent, gun-nutty society through impact litigation is a caricature of out-of-touch, elite-NGO liberalism.
-
-
Replying to @ChaseMadar
@ChMadar you don't think there's use in going after gunmaker profits?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chezrebellion
@chezrebellion Very little use in it. The macho hysteria that fuels gun-nuttery can only be quelled by reducing real economic insecurity.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar
@ChMadar at some point you have to start going after weapons makers, no? making huge profits for sales here, and plenty on foreign conflict1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chezrebellion
@chezrebellion I don't know much about gun industry but are domestic handgun makers also selling AK47s abroad? Could be! In any case, taxes…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@chezrebellion …& regs on weapons mfr'ing are preferable (when possible!) than impact litigation which more likely to arouse nasty backlash.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.