9. One way to think about Buckley/Vidal debate was it was a competition to prove who was most traditionally masculine. Buckley lost.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
10. Murray Kempton, Buckley's friend, very insightful on hidden gender dimensions of debate.
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
11. Kempton: "Buckley has taken as his the masculine side of the argument and Vidal is as in the feminine." Kempton thought this wrong.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
12. Kempton perceptively noted that in personality Buckley was more stereotypically feminine: sensitive, sentimental, "womanly"
3 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
13. Conversely, according to Kempton, Vidal was more stereotypically masculine: "detached, tough, cold and calculating in battle."
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
14. Kempton: Vidal controlled the argument by "the incitement of an excess of someone else's false masculinity."
1 reply 3 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
15. What Kempton said about Vidal versus Buckley also applies to Vidal versus Mailer. Vidal knew how to get under skin of opponents.
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
16. What Vidal realized is that violence is failure. Buckley threatened to punch out Vidal & lost. Mailer did head-butt Vidal and lost.
1 reply 4 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
17. Vidal after being physically attacked by Mailer. "Once again, words fail Norman Mailer."
1 reply 16 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
18. In sum, Gore Vidal was much more of man than William F. Buckley. This indisputable fact reflects badly on Vidal.
2 replies 3 retweets 15 likes
-
-
Replying to @ChaseMadar
@ChMadar Vidal was a pretty cold and unsympathetic character.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.