And yet the discourse on "radicalization" usually makes no mention at all of US foreign policy–even when radicals are loud & clear about it.
-
-
Replying to @ChaseMadar
Typical is this
@BrennanCenter report on domestic radicalization, with zero mention of US foreign policy: http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/rethinking_radicalization/ …5 replies 6 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar
Why didn't this
@BrennanCenter report on radicalization even mention US foreign policy? Would it have upset the group's donors?1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar
Main response to 9/11 among US policy elites has been doubling down on denial that US actions abroad have any COSTS.
#CVESummit#CVEspeakout3 replies 4 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar
@ChMadar@MJICrawford GO 2HELL STOP MAKING XCUSE 4MURDER THERE IS NONE CAN'T SAY MUCH 4 U OR ANY1 THAT WLD SAY SO1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yorkieartist
@yorkieartist@ChMadar the only reason I would use a gun would be to protect myself and family. Jihadists deserve to die if come on my land1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MJICrawford
@MJICrawford@yorkieartist Just out of curiosity: do you think invading Iraq "protected your family"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar
@ChMadar@yorkieartist In retrospect no. It just speeded up ISIS's timeline. They are here and have been since before 9/11.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MJICrawford
@MJICrawford@yorkieartist They have been here since 9/11? Where? And what's your source?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@MJICrawford Isis is going to launch an aerial attack from Syria on US territory? Where did you learn this?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.