@walterwkatz With genuine humanitarian assistance? Perhaps. With offensive bombing campaigns? Highly doubtful.
@walterwkatz @mtracey Humanitarian aid is not leaving people alone, and ISIS extermination of 40k Yazidis is hypothetical…
-
-
@walterwkatz
@mtracey They are at risk. But it is not clear that U.S. strikes will diminish that risk. U.S. strikes did not in Kosovo. -
@ChMadar @walterwkatz US strikes appear to have (possibly) alleviated some temporary risk for some Libyans, then caused more death & carnage -
@mtracey@ChMadar @walterwkatz I wonder how much risk? Lots of disinfo out there. E.g. http://antiwar.com/blog/2014/08/07/was-isis-capture-of-mosul-dam-a-virtual-event/ … -
Tweet unavailable
-
@walterwkatz
@JustinRaimondo@mtracey I too doubt it's a fabrication. Also, I'm skeptical of ISIS plans to exterminate/starve them all. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@walterwkatz
@JustinRaimondo@mtracey & I'll admit my skepticism ≠ certainty of falsehood. But enough for me to be against immediate strikes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@walterwkatz
@mtracey I'm not categorically opposed to the use of military force, no.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.