Another preliminary thought: nuclear secrets and identities of U.S. spies abroad seem to me the most legitimate state secrets.
-
-
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 would want to see it proved. Lots of folks seem to be assuming it with no actual example in mind.7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @conor64
@conor64@speechboy71 People are free to imagine fallout from Manning leaks but AP found no State sources threatened: http://news.yahoo.com/ap-review-finds-no-threatened-wikileaks-sources-074530441.html …1 reply 5 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar
@ChMadar What about this guy? http://bit.ly/IjCOI5@conor64@speechboy711 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheAlexKnapp
@TheAlexKnapp I wish him best of luck getting asylum in US. But most of blame for release of his name lies w/ David Leigh, not Manning.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar
@ChMadar I am not unsympathetic towards Manning. Just pointing out that at least one source was harmed.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheAlexKnapp
@TheAlexKnapp Regrettable, to be sure. But hardly the diplomatic meltdown prophesied by HRC. Nor does it negate immense value of the leaks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChaseMadar
@ChMadar I didn't say that it did! Merely pointing out that the claim that there were *no* harms seems dubious.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@TheAlexKnapp I hearya. (And not trying to impute official Washington's histrionics to you.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.