@JustinRaimondo @ggreenwald And I'm speculating. Not much info.
-
-
Replying to @jwcglaser
@jwcglaser@ggreenwald But we do have some information: one bro had strong political views. Both described themselves as "very religious."3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @JustinRaimondo
@JustinRaimondo Easy to adopt political/religious identity if you suddenly decide you want to launch senseless attack2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @jwcglaser
@jwcglaser that seems highly unlikely.@justinraimondo1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @reichenbachii
@brazoscole Why is that? Because it doesn't fit with how we'd like to understand all this?
@justinraimondo2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jwcglaser
@jwcglaser @brazoscole I think it's a stretch to say it was just a "senseless" attack 4 no reason. There was a motive? What was it?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JustinRaimondo
@JustinRaimondo@jwcglaser @brazoscole Did the two youths who did Columbine attack, which killed 13, have a motive or was it senseless?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ChaseMadar
@ChMadar they planned , and obviously had motives that fueled their emotions and subsequent actions.@justinraimondo@jwcglaser3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @reichenbachii
@brazoscole
@JustinRaimondo@jwcglaser Are you talking about Klebold and Harris or the Tsarnaev bros?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@brazoscole @JustinRaimondo @jwcglaser But I think Columbine was about 98% senseless, and doubt that assessment is a minority opinion.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.