And the statement is, philosophically, too empty to even disagree with. People have radically different visions of what "the best" means, that's why there is conflict.https://twitter.com/johnastoehr/status/1050793635644665856 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did he also say it was legal?
-
I don't remember that even being addressed. I do remember him saying that the invasion "was probably not in our national interest," which is at least interesting.
-
So it was an example of morally justified self-sacrifice by the US? Interesting that the legality may not have come up... in NYU of all places.
-
I can't say for certain that the issue of legality wasn't addressed, only that I don't remember it…
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.