Has there been the slightest change in the GOP's Middle East foreign policy since Bush/Cheney invaded Iraq? If so, I don't see it, even in the supposedly different current administration.https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1047538632557441024 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
And I think there would've been quite a bit of GOP pressure *against* her waging wars, for instance bombing Assad positions in Syria. GOP voters are v tribal about this, polls show: for it if their guy does it; agin' it if a Dem's in power.
Again, I say this not to whitewash her awful foreign policy record, but I do think US foreign relations would have been quite different, and better, had she not managed to fuck up what should've been unfuckuppable.
What’s funny is that she has repeatedly admitted that she’s terrible at campaigning and somehow that coexisted alongside the argument that she was and is the best person to take on Trump.
it's not fair that she gets less blame than Putin for her stunning defeat
The House investigation of Russian interference has been a total joke but I’ll note that they’ve spent more time on it than the DNC has spent on an autopsy of the election.
I generally agree but I’m not sure GOP pressure would have actually held up. The Syria chemical weapons showdown during Obama’s tenure is instructive. The Congress has just completely abandoned its war authority.
I can’t imagine the screams we’d be hearing from the GOP re: Korea had Hillary won. But they’re happy to give Trump credit for Moon & Kim’s accomplishments.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.