-
-
-
I realize that things probably wouldn’t be different under a Clinton administration but I still can’t get over the people who thought Donald ‘We’re Going To Do A Lot Worse Than Waterboarding’ Trump was going to be some sort of pacifist.
-
Yes, those takes were GHASTLY. Much as I loathe Hillary, I do think she wouldve conducted a quite different foreign policy; for instance I think she would definitely not have killed the Iran Deal, or un-normalized Cuba relations.
-
And I think there would've been quite a bit of GOP pressure *against* her waging wars, for instance bombing Assad positions in Syria. GOP voters are v tribal about this, polls show: for it if their guy does it; agin' it if a Dem's in power.
-
Again, I say this not to whitewash her awful foreign policy record, but I do think US foreign relations would have been quite different, and better, had she not managed to fuck up what should've been unfuckuppable.
-
What’s funny is that she has repeatedly admitted that she’s terrible at campaigning and somehow that coexisted alongside the argument that she was and is the best person to take on Trump.
-
it's not fair that she gets less blame than Putin for her stunning defeat
-
The House investigation of Russian interference has been a total joke but I’ll note that they’ve spent more time on it than the DNC has spent on an autopsy of the election.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So much for Trump the restrainer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is still broad bipartisan support for USs war for the Greater Middle East
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.