@CharlotteCook What do you take from it?
@charlielyne @GuyLodge but that's what I'm saying. He's distinctly not critiquing the good critics
-
-
@CharlotteCook@GuyLodge Wait wait wait, you're saying JE is writing a bad argument to comment on critics' bad arguments? That's generous! -
@charlielyne@guylodge no, not what I was saying at all -
@CharlotteCook@GuyLodge I'm lost. I said JE's piece is shit for same reason critics assuming intentions is shit. -
@charlielyne@CharlotteCook@GuyLodge The aim of JE's piece is surely only to provoke film critics in a bid to prove his point, no? -
@MarkDTowers@charlielyne@CharlotteCook To provoke them, yes. To prove his point? I'm not quite sure what that is. -
@GuyLodge@charlielyne@CharlotteCook I don't think it's a particularly well made point, but saying they're insecure is the gist I got. -
@MarkDTowers@charlielyne@CharlotteCook If his point is that they're *insecure*, then the whole piece can be considered a massive own goal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.