I am sure that the founders would have been fine with reasonable gun control regulations.
-
-
-
To gun control opponents the opening part of 2nd Amendment is just meaningless words. I think a "well regulated militia" means what it implies.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is, of course, insane.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Firearms in the late 1700s consisted of flintlocks. They could not have even imagined a gun capable of firing dozens of rounds within seconds, which then can be reloaded to do it again easily.
-
First amendment, when written, didn't include Twitter, Facebook, digital media
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The same NRA wouldn't allow guns into their own convention!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its quite shocking that sane people in America can argue against tighter gun controls. Nowhere else in the western world has your gunlaws & these senseless, brutal massacres.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The NRA (gun manufacturer) argument boils down to a belief that massacres are part of the price of DOING BUSINESS.
-
This isn't and has never been about the 2nd Amendment. It's about MONEY. Specifically, the PROFITS of gun manufacturers. The NRA is to gun manufacturers as the Tobacco Institute was to Big Tobacco.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or they only had muskets -- & were attached to a "well-regulated militia." I can't understand why that part of the 2a is always omitted (except NRA $ of course)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.